wsk/deerflow-code
1
0 Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge branch 'ji' into master (操作日志 Y-Log 上报)

Browse Source 
# Conflicts:
#	CLAUDE.md
This commit is contained in:
Administrator committed 2026-06-23 19:22:53 +08:00
2 parents ce3a5b6bf9 a1fbfaf864
commit 053d3e300e
35 files changed
+1182 -125
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

No files matched your search

CLAUDE.md
+2 -1
View File
@@ -88,8 +88,9 @@ The frontend (`frontend-web/`) is a React 19 + Vite SPA:
- **LLM streaming**: `@langchain/langgraph-sdk` streams messages from the backend via SSE
- **UI**: Radix UI primitives + TailwindCSS v4 + shadcn-style components in `src/components/ui/`
- **Shims**: `src/shims/` provides `next/link` and `next/navigation` polyfills (original code was Next.js)
- **Login URL params** (`LoginPage.tsx`, frontend-only — the backend never sees these): besides the auth params (`ticket`/`userId`/`env`/`theme`/`yUserId`/`token`/`access_token`/`authToken`/`password`), the page supports a **task deep-link** via `?taskId=&goPath=`. After login it calls the consumer API `GET {VITE_AIPI_CONSUMER_URL}/taskAnalyseSearch/cop-task-detail?taskId=` (header `Authorization: Bearer admin`, auto-injected by `utils/request.ts`), stashes the full `data` (`id/overview/taskDirection/taskName/taskContent`) into `sessionStorage["login.copTaskDetail"]`, then routes by `goPath`: base codes `3qfx`/`rwfx`/`xdfx` → that business's configured **single agent** Q&A inside a **任务工作区** (resolved via `/api/business-mapping`; `resolveTaskDeeplinkTarget` calls `persistTaskContext({taskId, agentId, openingText})` and navigates to the `…/chats` **index**, which opens the latest task conversation or 新建 — a 1:N task↔对话 workspace, NOT `pendingAgentMessage`); the `-A` suffix (`3qfx-A`/…) → **multi-agent roundtable** with `roundtablePrefill.businessCode` so the page auto-selects the configured 业务链条. **xdfx's deep-link `?taskId=` is actually an 行动id, not a 任务id** — `resolveDeeplinkTaskId(goPath, rawId)` (called in `LoginPage` before everything) detects `xdfx`/`xdfx-A` and resolves it via `GET {action_detail_url}/{actionId}` → `data.taskId` (`fetchTaskIdFromAction`; `action_test`+`mock.action_detail` for offline testing); the resolved 任务id then drives `cop-task-detail`, the purpose tree, and the 1:N binding (other businesses pass the id through unchanged). **xdfx additionally partitions its chat records by 行动id (action_id), NOT by task_id**: `resolveTaskDeeplinkTarget` sets `partitionByAction:true` + keeps the raw action_id as `TaskContext.actionId`, so new threads are tagged `metadata.{taskId,actionId}` (taskId kept only to preserve the backend「任务深链对话全局共享」semantics, which keys off `metadata.taskId`) and the conversation list filters by `actionId` (+`agent_id`) — different actions of the same task get separate lists. xdfx's first-question opening text also appends `行动id（action_id）为…` (see `buildOpeningText` / `taskThreadMetadata`). goPath→businessCode: `3qfx`→`3Q`, `rwfx`→`6BF`, `xdfx`→`7BF`. The roundtable target also threads the URL `taskId` into `roundtablePrefill.taskId` (`resolveTaskDeeplinkTarget(goPath, detail, taskId)`), which turns on two taskId-scoped behaviors: (1) **separate, unpartitioned per-task storage** — taskId 会商聊天记录 live in their **own** store/table (`roundtable_task_drafts`), keyed **only by `task_id`** (one taskId = many records, shared across users, **no user 分权** at all; `created_by` is audit-only), kept entirely out of the per-user personal store (`roundtable_drafts`, now strictly per-user) so the two never mix. Backend router `/api/roundtable-task-drafts` (`GET /by-task/{id}` + `/by-task/{id}/latest`, `POST`, `GET/PUT/DELETE /{id}` — all user-agnostic); frontend client `roundtable-planning/api/task-drafts.ts`, and `useDraftPersistence`/`useRoundtableDrafts` route **all** CRUD to it when a `taskId` is present (else the personal `drafts.ts`). The matching **background jobs** are shared by task too: `roundtable_jobs.task_id` marks a task job; reads/dedup/stream/resume/cancel pass `?task_id=` so any user opening the task sees the same running 研讨 (progress/flowchart), and the executor writes the final report back to the task-draft store. Existing rows are moved over by `scripts/migrate_roundtable_task_drafts.py` (migration `20260618_01`). The history dropdown filters to the task and 新建 keeps the binding; (2) **Step-3 auto structured output** — after the `roundtable-summary` agent writes the Markdown report it automatically runs a second round emitting a `flow-json` flowchart (`useStep3Summary` `autoFlow`+`chainLevels`), whose hierarchy follows the business chain's stage goals (任务 → 目的 → 行为体 → …; coordinatorPrompt-specified hierarchy wins) and whose nodes never carry 阶段编号/阶段名 (the prior bug). **Both targets render embedded under the 任务管理 layout** — nested routes under `task-management/<business-path>/{roundtable,agent/:agent_id/chats}` in `StrategyRoutes.tsx` (`<business-path>` = `plan-task-sentiment` / `plan-task/plan-task-fx` / `plan-task/plan-task-action`, matching the COH中任务 menu paths in `sidebar-menu.ts`) so the global sidebar keeps 任务管理 → COH中任务 → the matching business highlighted. **All three single-agent businesses share `TaskFxWorkspace`** (`task-components/TaskFxWorkspace.tsx`): left = a「当前任务」card (`readCopTaskDetail()` 任务名称 + 简介, desensitized, 留存 above 新建对话) + per-task 1:N conversation list (`useTaskThreads(taskId, agentId, actionId?)` — filtered by **both** `metadata.taskId` AND `metadata.agent_id` so the three businesses' conversations staLine truncated
- **Login URL params** (`LoginPage.tsx`, frontend-only — the backend never sees these): besides the auth params (`ticket`/`userId`/`env`/`theme`/`yUserId`/`token`/`access_token`/`authToken`/`password`), the page supports a **task deep-link** via `?taskId=&goPath=`. After login it calls the consumer API `GET {VITE_AIPI_CONSUMER_URL}/taskAnalyseSearch/cop-task-detail?taskId=` (header `Authorization: Bearer admin`, auto-injected by `utils/request.ts`), stashes the full `data` (`id/overview/taskDirection/taskName/taskContent`) into `sessionStorage["login.copTaskDetail"]`, then routes by `goPath`: base codes `3qfx`/`rwfx`/`xdfx` → that business's configured **single agent** Q&A inside a **任务工作区** (resolved via `/api/business-mapping`; `resolveTaskDeeplinkTarget` calls `persistTaskContext({taskId, agentId, openingText})` and navigates to the `…/chats` **index**, which opens the latest task conversation or 新建 — a 1:N task↔对话 workspace, NOT `pendingAgentMessage`); the `-A` suffix (`3qfx-A`/…) → **multi-agent roundtable** with `roundtablePrefill.businessCode` so the page auto-selects the configured 业务链条. **xdfx's deep-link `?taskId=` is actually an 行动id, not a 任务id** — `resolveDeeplinkTaskId(goPath, rawId)` (called in `LoginPage` before everything) detects `xdfx`/`xdfx-A` and resolves it via `GET {action_detail_url}/{actionId}` → `data.taskId` (`fetchTaskIdFromAction`; `action_test`+`mock.action_detail` for offline testing); the resolved 任务id then drives `cop-task-detail`, the purpose tree, and the 1:N binding (other businesses pass the id through unchanged). **xdfx additionally partitions its chat records by 行动id (action_id), NOT by task_id**: `resolveTaskDeeplinkTarget` sets `partitionByAction:true` + keeps the raw action_id as `TaskContext.actionId`, so new threads are tagged `metadata.{taskId,actionId}` (taskId kept only to preserve the backend「任务深链对话全局共享」semantics, which keys off `metadata.taskId`) and the conversation list filters by `actionId` (+`agent_id`) — different actions of the same task get separate lists. xdfx's first-question opening text also appends `行动id（action_id）为…` (see `buildOpeningText` / `taskThreadMetadata`). goPath→businessCode: `3qfx`→`3Q`, `rwfx`→`6BF`, `xdfx`→`7BF`. The roundtable target also threads the URL `taskId` into `roundtablePrefill.taskId` (`resolveTaskDeeplinkTarget(goPath, detail, taskId)`), which turns on two taskId-scoped behaviors: (1) **separate, unpartitioned per-task storage** — taskId 会商聊天记录 live in their **own** store/table (`roundtable_task_drafts`), keyed **only by `task_id`** (one taskId = many records, shared across users, **no user 分权** at all; `created_by` is audit-only), kept entirely out of the per-user personal store (`roundtable_drafts`, now strictly per-user) so the two never mix. Backend router `/api/roundtable-task-drafts` (`GET /by-task/{id}` + `/by-task/{id}/latest`, `POST`, `GET/PUT/DELETE /{id}` — all user-agnostic); frontend client `roundtable-planning/api/task-drafts.ts`, and `useDraftPersistence`/`useRoundtableDrafts` route **all** CRUD to it when a `taskId` is present (else the personal `drafts.ts`). The matching **background jobs** are shared by task too: `roundtable_jobs.task_id` marks a task job; reads/dedup/stream/resume/cancel pass `?task_id=` so any user opening the task sees the same running 研讨 (progress/flowchart), and the executor writes the final report back to the task-draft store. Existing rows are moved over by `scripts/migrate_roundtable_task_drafts.py` (migration `20260618_01`). The history dropdown filters to the task and 新建 keeps the binding; (2) **Step-3 auto structured output** — after the `roundtable-summary` agent writes the Markdown report it automatically runs a second round emitting a `flow-json` flowchart (`useStep3Summary` `autoFlow`+`chainLevels`), whose hierarchy follows the business chain's stage goals (任务 → 目的 → 行为体 → …; coordinatorPrompt-specified hierarchy wins) and whose nodes never carry 阶段编号/阶段名 (the prior bug). **Both targets render embedded under the 任务管理 layout** — nested routes under `task-management/<business-path>/{roundtable,agent/:agent_id/chats}` in `StrategyRoutes.tsx` (`<business-path>` = `plan-task-sentiment` / `plan-task/plan-task-fx` / `plan-task/plan-task-action`, matching the COH中任务 menu paths in `sidebar-menu.ts`) so the global sidebar keeps 任务管理 → COH中任务 → the matching business highlighted. **All three single-agent businesses share `TaskFxWorkspace`** (`task-components/TaskFxWorkspace.tsx`): left = a「当前任务」card (`readCopTaskDetail()` 任务名称 + 简介, desensitized, 留存 above 新建对话) + per-task 1:N conversation list (`useTaskThreads(taskId, agentId, actionId?)` — filtered by **both** `metadata.taskId` AND `metadata.agent_id` so the three businesses' conversations staLine truncated
- **iframe 嵌入模式 (外部系统用 iframe 套用深链问答/会商)** — 三个**按标签页**开关，全部由深链 URL 参数开启、存进同一份 `sessionStorage` 会话（`embed.session`，键名常量在 `core/embed/embed-session.ts`），跨登录跳转/刷新/页内导航存活，**绝不跨标签污染**同浏览器另开的正常系统页。核心隔离手法：用 `sessionStorage`（按标签页/浏览上下文隔离，iframe 即便同源也有独立一份）而非 `localStorage`（跨标签共享）。开关：(1) **`?embed=1`（可带 `&theme=`）** — 去全局 chrome（`PageLayout` 的 `pageSidebarAllowed && !isEmbedActive()` → 隐藏 Header + PageSidebar）+ 按外部主题色**强制**明/暗：走 next-themes 的 `forcedTheme`（`App.tsx` `AppProviders` 调 `resolveForcedEmbedTheme`，**不写** localStorage `strategy-theme`），离散映射 `dark-blue`/`dark`→深、其余→浅；嵌入侧**绝不**调 `setTheme`/`persistSidebarEnabled`（那俩落 localStorage 跨标签污染，`LoginPage` 据 `readEmbedParam` 跳过）。(2) **`?hideJump=1`** — 隐藏深链底部「快捷跳转」栏 `TaskJumpBar` 的两部分（底部「下一步」等按钮 + 右侧垂直居中悬浮菜单），单智能体问答 + 会商共用该栏，`isJumpBarHidden()` 为真时整条 `return null`。(3) **登录用户隔离** — 嵌入态下鉴权/身份键（`deerflow.auth` token、`userInfo`、`login.*`、`tools_token`、maxkey/userDetail token）全部经 `core/auth/scoped-storage.ts` 的 `authStorage()`（嵌入→sessionStorage / 正常→localStorage）读写，使 iframe 里登录的用户与正常登录用户**完全隔离**、互不覆盖；所有 token 读取都过 `getStoredAuth()`/`getAuthorizationHeaderValue()`（API 客户端 `core/api/*` 全走这俩），改中心函数即让全体调用方自动隔离；跨标签账号变更监听 `AuthSyncWatcher`（`core/auth/sync.tsx`）在嵌入态禁用。嵌入会话在 `main.tsx` 渲染前 `syncEmbedSessionFromCurrentUrl()` 同步启用（早于任何鉴权写入，避免首帧 effect 顺序漏写 localStorage）；`AppProviders` 的 effect 再按 SPA 导航同步。`embed=0`/`hideJump=0` 可显式关闭。正常（非嵌入）标签页所有 `isXxx()` 恒 false，行为**零变化**。第三个开关 `?isolate=1`（**独立登录会话**）把同一套**登录用户隔离**单独提供给**普通（带 chrome）标签页**——只切换鉴权存储、不去 chrome / 不强制主题 / 不动跳转栏：`authStorage()` 的条件从「仅嵌入」放宽为 `isEmbedActive() || isIsolatedSession()`，`AuthSyncWatcher` 的跨标签监听对嵌入态**或**独立态都即时忽略（handler 内实时判，运行时开关也即刻生效）。除 URL 参数外，**设置 → 外观 →「登录会话」** 有一个 Switch「独立登录会话（本标签页）」运行时切换（`setIsolatedSession`，`appearance-settings-page.tsx`）：**开启时先 `migrateAuthToSession()`**（`scoped-storage.ts`，把 localStorage 的受保护键 `deerflow.auth`/`userInfo`/`userId`/`tools_token` + `login.*` 前缀快照搬进 sessionStorage）再翻标志，故无感不登出；此后本标签页登录态独立——别处登录/换号影响不到它，它换号也影响不到别人，但关掉该标签即结束（需重登）。开启给 toast 提示。
- **操作日志（Y-Log）上报** — 用户的关键操作（登录登出/查询/查看/增删改/启停/导入导出/问答等）成功后，**前端直连**外部接口 `POST {write_url}`（默认 `https://ch1.b.uat.4.cn/api/y-log/write`）记一条审计日志。核心模块 `src/core/log/`：`y-log.ts`（`writeYLog(params)` + `OptType` 枚举 0/1/3..12；**异步即发即忘、永不 await、永不抛错、失败静默**，自动把完整 url 转相对路径去 ip/host、对象入参/返回自动 `JSON.stringify` + 50k 裁剪、`optResult` 恒 0 只报成功），`y-log-config.ts`（从公开只读 `GET /api/public/config/y-log` 拉 `{enabled, writeUrl}`，模块级缓存 + 去重 + 默认兜底；`App.tsx` `AppProviders` 启动预热 `fetchYLogConfig()`），`y-log-token.ts`（token1 = token 登录的 `?authToken=`，经 [[scoped-storage]] 的 `authStorage*` 存取，嵌入态自动隔离）。**双门控**：仅当①存在 token1（即用 token 登录，`LoginPage` 成功后 `persistYLogToken(authToken)`，登出 `account-settings-page.tsx` 先报后清 token1）且②配置 `enabled && writeUrl` 才上报；否则一律不发。`optDetail` 统一「B1-CM助手-…」（**禁内部框架名**）。埋点集中在各 API client 的成功路径：`strategy-components/api/{sensitive-words,menu-overrides,task-buttons,skill-addresses,light-apps}.ts`、`roundtable-planning/api/{drafts,task-drafts,roundtable-jobs}.ts`、`core/{agents,scheduled-tasks,knowledge}/api.ts`、`core/api/markdown-docx-export.ts`，以及问答完成钩子（`ChatPage`/`AgentChatPage` 的 `useThreadStream` `onFinish`，用最终汇总文本作 `returnParam`，optType 12）。后端仅新增公开只读配置：`deerflow/config/y_log_config.py`（`YLogConfig{enabled,write_url}`）挂到 `AppConfig.y_log`，`app/gateway/routers/public_config.py` 加 `GET /api/public/config/y-log`，地址写在 `config.yaml` 的 `y_log` 段（mtime 热重载，前端无需重建）；**不做后端代理**。Tests：`tests/test_y_log_config.py`。
### Configuration